Manuscript Under Editorial Consideration Nature

If the editors decide that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in Review of Scientific Instruments, you may transfer your manuscript, without resubmitting, to AIP Advances for immediate consideration. Submission of the manuscript will be held to imply that it has not been previously published and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and further that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere. Presubmission enquiries can be useful to get some feedback and help place work in some bigger picture. Author Guidelines and Manuscript Submission. the manuscript contains no material that is abusive, defamatory, discriminatory, obscene, fraudulent or illegal. I am pleased to inform you that we are sending your manuscript out for formal peer review. If author and reviewers meet insoluble contradictions regarding revision of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief resolves the conflict by his own authority. Nature Methods is a forum for the publication of novel methods and significant improvements to tried-and-tested basic research techniques in the life sciences. Additionally, the editors will make every effort to ensure the integrity of the review process by not revealing the identity of the reviewers of a manuscript to the authors of that manuscript. The editors will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers. "Under consideration" in some journals like nature is equivalent to " with the editor" in other journals such as Elsevier and Springer publications. The article was accepted after three rounds of revisions, and the status changes are attached for others' reference. Authors can also enter the names of potential peer reviewers they wish to exclude from consideration in the peer review of their manuscript, during the initial submission progress. 3 Funding acknowledgement. Authorship 4. AIMS & SCOPE. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Stephen Scharf, MD- No financial consideration for this manuscript. It is editorial policy that manuscripts are sent to two anonymous peer reviewers. Notfollowing the formatspecified for a particular journal may be taken as carelessness on the part of the author,. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. I am pleased to inform you that we are sending your manuscript out for formal peer review. Upon submission of any manuscript for consideration for publication in a journal published by the Baishideng Publishing Group (BPG), the scientific editor first performs a search of the Web of Science, Google and/or PubMed databases to determine the topical relevance and timeliness of the manuscript’s content as well as to make an initial assessment of potential academic misconduct related to the general features of the study and/or topical content. Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. The editors and editorial board will consider new topics, and authors should not be restricted by those listed below. Authors are. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. The editor will evaluate manuscripts without regard to the author’s race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy. SUBMISSION Submissiona of an article implies that the results described have not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere, without the written consent of the publisher. In case the manuscript is acceptable for peer review, the Subject Editor has to invite reviewers by clicking on the Invite reviewers link. Manuscript Description Task Force Active between February 2003 and December 2005, this group reviewed and finalised the material now forming 10. Submission of the manuscript will be held to imply that it has not been previously published and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and further that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere. cut marks on bones" to Nature Communications. Questions regarding manuscript handling and status should be addressed to [email protected] Editorial criteria and processes This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor's final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer). published paper of which they have personal knowledge. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The editor and the editorial board are compromised to not disclose any information on a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than reviewers and potential reviewers. It is editorial policy that manuscripts are sent to two anonymous peer reviewers. If anything, that notification is a signal to get ready for the next step. Depending on the nature and content of the manuscript, either the Editor-in-Chief will send the manuscript to an appropriate member of the Advisory Board or Editorial Board who will then send the manuscript to at least two competent reviewers, or the Editor-in-Chief will ask two appropriate members of the Advisory Board and/or Editorial Board. The guidelines below offer suggestions to authors and describe paper selection, review, revision, and publication processes. In case the author fails to do so within 3 months since receiving a copy of the initial review, the editorial board takes the manuscript off the register and notifies the author accordingly. Title of manuscript only – centered, double-spaced, etc. ) 2019: Nature: 14. Authors should request formal acknowledgment from the journal to the effect that the editors understand the manuscript has been withdrawn from future consideration. All the communication between the Editorial Office and the author is realized via e-mail. All submissions require a title page with the following information on the first page(s) of the manuscript file: 1. Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if it is accepted for publication, the copyrights in the submitted work, such as the right of reproduction or public transmission, including the copyrights protected under any applicable law of any foreign countries, shall be assigned exclusively to Hitotsubashi University in. The Editor reviews the revised manuscript after the authors have made the minor changes. ), must be listed on the permission log and flagged for further review by the Corwin editorial team. Stage 2: Full manuscript submission and review. Sites where to Get Information what to Do if Nature Manuscript Under Consideration has gotten 455 views and has gathered 1 votes from 1 voters. Please provide your manuscript an informative 100-250 word abstract. NIH policy allows the submission of certain elements of a competing application to be deferred until later in the application process, after review when the application is under consideration for funding. Reviewer conflict of interest Conflict of interest (COI) self-assessment must be performed by members of the editorial team and external peer reviewers involved in the assessment of manuscripts. See our editorial policies for author guidance on good citation practice. Please send work to our editorial and business office, along with a cover letter explaining your project. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. The editorial board gives preference to works in which the following issues are analysed: economic mechanisms, in particular monetary processes, financial markets, and the functioning of financial institutions and their impact on economic processes. click here. The editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. 2 Adoption under this. statement confirming the manuscript has not been previously published by any of the authors and/or is not under consideration for publication in another journal at the time of submission. particularly, they said i have to cut down the number of words of my manuscript to 5000 and the resubmit. I also grant the Press the right to publish my contribution in all languages and for all future print and electronic editions, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (BY-NC). Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. “Submissions with a Decision”或“Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration”此状态表面你的文章不幸被拒。. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration is an essential forum for both established and early-career researchers in all aspects of management and business in the Asia-Pacific region. Web links and URLs: All web links and URLs, including links to the authors' own websites, should be given a reference number and included in the reference list rather than within the text of the manuscript. Only previously unpublished manuscripts must be submitted to the Journal, and they should not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Citing articles in Research Integrity and Peer Review. Are viewer should also call to the editor's attentionany substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. The articles may be of an empirical or theoretical nature. When a manuscript is submitted to Diasporic Italy, it should not have been published elsewhere nor be under consideration by any other journal. Board Members 3. Authors will be able to track the status of their manuscripts via the online system. You can check the Editorial Board for the chief Editor, and sometimes find the name of the Editor responsible for the specific section into which your work falls. TABLE TYPES OF MANUSCRIPT AND WORD LIMITS CHECKLIST. The guidelines below offer suggestions to authors and describe paper selection, review, revision, and publication processes. Select from the following submission options based on the length of 151 your manuscript: 152 1. Once the manuscript is accepted or revision is required, reviewers’ comments and instructions will be sent to the corresponding author. In case the author fails to do so within 3 months since receiving a copy of the initial review, the editorial board takes the manuscript off the register and notifies the author accordingly. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Bauer Media. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. ) 2019: Nature: 14. However, this is the first time in 15 years serving as a reviewer and submitting manuscripts as an author that I have encountered a dual review process involving peer review prior to acceptance of a manuscript and then an independent editorial review afterwards. Submissions must include a cover letter stating that the manuscript has not been previously published (except in abstract form), is not presently under consideration by another journal, and will not be submitted to another journal before a final editorial decision from JPAH is rendered. A reviewer should also call to the editors' attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. The Florida Historical Quarterly is a peer-refereed journal and accepts for consideration manuscripts on the history of Florida, its people, and its historical relationships to the United States, the Atlantic World, the Caribbean, or Latin America. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Papers that are found to have been plagiarized from a manuscript by other authors, whether published or unpublished, will incur plagiarism sanctions. The work under consideration for publication. The CFR is prima facie evidence of the original documents published in the Federal Register (44 U. A recent submission to the Journal of Memory and Language, an Elsevier journal has made my hyper-aware of how the way a manuscript's progress through the Elsevier Editorial System (EES) is indicated. The editorial priority of the Journal will be on novelty in the fields of Evolution, Development, Aging, Epigenetics, Stem cell biology, Human disease research, Precision medicine and Plant biology. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the corresponding journal. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review. If quantitative methods use is necessary the authors are expected to prove in the manuscript that quantification of the phenomena under study is warranted. rtf) files of manuscripts can be submitted as email attachments to the editorial office at: [email protected] A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. While a manuscript is under consideration at Science Translational Medicine no versions revised in response to editorial input and peer review should be posted on a preprint server. "Under consideration" in some journals like nature is equivalent to " with the editor" in other journals such as Elsevier and Springer publications. Editors should allow appeals to override earlier decisions following appropriate reconsideration of the editorial process and decision making (for example, additional factual input by the authors, revisions, extra material in the manuscript, or appeals about conflicts of interest and concerns about biased peer review). Manuscripts submitted to PSQ should be original research and should not be under consideration by any other journal at the same time. See other details in these instructions for additional requirements. Back to top. A 'Manuscript Approved' message will display on your author desktop to confirm the submission. Can anybody add a point of two about the style of Nature communications manuscript review process: 1. The editorial office first check that all files arrived intact, then print the paper, to check for any major errors that would prevent the paper from being refereed. They should not disclose any information about a manuscript to anyone other than reviewers and potential reviewers. The secondary nature (translation) of this manuscript will be explicitly noted in the final publication. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. com To: Paul. Please find enclosed the manuscript: Association of a SNP in the ALOX5AP gene with risk of Ischemic Stroke, by Sarah Hamilton, et al. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by a proper citation. The editorial staff is to evaluate original manuscripts solely on the basis of their academic merit – based on criteria such as the study’s importance, originality, validity and clarity – and on their relevance for the journal, independently of the race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, nationality, political philosophy, institutional affiliation or beliefs of the author/s. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. After consideration by at least two prestigious journals, Nature and JAMA, his research remains unpublished. You can access your manuscript via the 'Live Manuscript' folder at any time during the editorial process. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria; That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Please find enclosed a manuscript entitled: “Bedform genesis in bedrock substrates: insights into formative processes from a new experimental approach and the importance of suspension-dominated abrasion” which I am submitting for exclusive consideration for publication in Geomorphology. If you have not done so already, please alert us to any related manuscripts from your group that are under consideration or in press at other journals, or are being written up for submission to other journals (see. The manuscript has not been published formerly (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns a development of a previous work (please provide clarity on the re-utilization of material to maintain a strategic distance from the trace of. It will be removed from the list if the paper is rejected or accepted for publication, or if we are asked to remove it by the corresponding author. 1507, the contents of the CFR, a special edition of the Federal Register, shall be judicially noticed. The WES editorial board reserves the right to remove or to censor referee reports and any other comments if they contain personal insults or if they are not of substantial nature or of direct relevance to the issues raised in the manuscript under review. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief/Associate Editor (together with Editorial Board if required) according to reviewers' critical comments. The articles may be of an empirical or theoretical nature. However, studies that require longer time will also be considered – please consult the editorial team to agree on a timeline. • Evaluation of revised manuscripts and the authors’ response to reviewer comments. To keep abreast of current trends and challenges, we travel to multiple. - The manuscript has not been published previously in total or in part, is not accepted for publication or under consideration by another journal B. The editor is checking for THE ULUTAS MEDICAL JOURNAL. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Peer review policy 2. If an Editorial Board member of or reviewer for the journal authors or co-authors a manuscript, that person will not be involved in the peer review or decision-making process for the paper. An author may list more than one contribution, and more than one author may have contributed to the same aspect of the work. Nat 系列每本動作都不太一樣 不過大致會卡個幾天(大約一周) 然後status變成 under editorial consideration 這才是它們內部編輯真的討論 如果對你有興趣 會寄給你check list (非常慘烈的表格) 你回覆後才會外審 所以你這個就是您好我收到的你的投稿的意思 非常佩服台灣生. A Subject Index to Chapter I—U. Manuscript Description Task Force Active between February 2003 and December 2005, this group reviewed and finalised the material now forming 10. 1 weeks: 14. Examples of the Vancouver reference style are shown below. An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. A Writer’s Agreement Form will be sent for all manuscripts accepted for publication, detailing publication terms and. All the authors listed in the manuscript are assumed to have agreed to the following policy of Ann Dermatol on submission of manuscripts. ) 2019: Nature: 14. The submission must be original, be based upon a high level of evidence, have immediate relevance to patient care, and not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We thank the editor and reviewers for their thoughtful and detailed comments and believe the manuscript is not significantly improved. You can check the Editorial Board for the chief Editor, and sometimes find the name of the Editor responsible for the specific section into which your work falls. Sites where to Get Information what to Do if Nature Manuscript Under Consideration is a top list in the Business & Finance category on rankly. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. When the submission is complete, you will receive a confirmation email with a manuscript ID. If author and reviewers meet insoluble contradictions regarding revision of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief resolves the conflict by his own authority. Nature: n/a: n/a: 12. They should call to the responsible editor's attention any major resemblances between a manuscript under consideration and other published articles or papers of which they are aware, as well as any concerns they might have in relation to the ethical acceptability of the research reported in the manuscript. A Writer’s Agreement Form will be sent for all manuscripts accepted for publication, detailing publication terms and. 5 Authors will disclose if any other manuscripts related to their submission are under consideration by other journals during the editorial process. so i presume your case could probably due to some technical requirements. The nature and level of contribution of all authors of accepted manuscripts must be indicated, i. The editor and the editorial staff should not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than reviewers and potential reviewers. The manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere All authors meet the definition of authorship as set out by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Footnote 22 Permission has been obtained from the copyright holder(s) if indicated, for the use of any third-party textual, graphic, artistic or other material. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Any paper cited as 'in press' or under review elsewhere must be uploaded as part of the manuscript submission as a file 'not for review' so that it can be seen by the editors and, if necessary, made available to the referees. Questions concerning editorial policies or decisions should be addressed to the Editors at [email protected] That said, the citation issue and possible overlap was not a main reason for our decision. Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, or thesis) and that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Under the provisions of 44 U. Such circumstances will be a consideration in the editorial review process and may be a cause for rejection. Review Process. Unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used in an editor’s own research except with the consent of the author. Frank Sciurba, MD- No relevant disclosures in 36 months prior to the submission of this manuscript. - The manuscript has not been published previously in total or in part, is not accepted for publication or under consideration by another journal B. The author who submits the manuscript for publication accepts the responsibility of notifying all co-authors of the manuscript being submitted. non-Linear Mech. the manuscript accordingly. Submit your manuscript online with Manuscript FastTrack at this link. The editor and the editorial staff should not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than reviewers and potential reviewers. Stage 1: Initial manuscript submission and review Nature Human Behaviour aims to publish research of outstanding significance. While authors are free to send simultaneous letters of inquiry, we respectfully ask that you inform us if your work is under consideration elsewhere. The appeal should provide a point-by-point scientific rebuttal of the rejection decision. An author may list more than one contribution, and more than one author may have contributed to the same aspect of the work. • Provided the authors with feedback on how to improve the submitted manuscripts for publication. The graphic below shows how a typical manuscript goes through the Editorial Manager system, along with some of the terms used to describe the manuscript’s status. In case you encounter any difficulties while submitting your manuscript online, please contact the editorial office (E-mail: [email protected] 1 Acknowledgements 6. Authors are. It lacks a summary review of the results obtained in the literature, the nature of tribological phenomena involved in the hot extrusion of aluminium, and a brief. The manuscript will be then rejected/returned through the online editorial system and the respective notification email will be sent from the Editorial Office. We do not rush to our editorial decisions based on a checklist. All the communication between the Editorial Office and the author is realized via e-mail. The favored approach includes counseling on appropriate weight gain, exercise, and diet and/or pharmacologic treatment to achieve optimal control. provided compensation should be listed under sources of funding (4). Also provided in our Reviewer area is a questionnaire to specifically guide your manuscript evaluation. This is how we handle it for Limnology and Oceanography. Papers will be accepted for review only if they are not under consideration by another journal. Psychology of Violence uses structured abstracts divided into the following sections, with headings: Objective, Method, Results, and Conclusions. Nature Communications offers authors of papers that have been sent out for review the option to have the corresponding preprint included in a public list. What is In Review?. Manuscript Preparation Manuscripts should be typed single-spaced with one-inch margins and Times New Roman, 12-point font size. The articles may be of an empirical or theoretical nature. Submissions that are incomplete or that do not comply with the guidelines below will be returned to the author for completion before they will be entered into the editorial process. For 21 days the manuscript status was "under consideration". The work under consideration for publication. Nature Methods has no external editorial board; all decisions are made by the team of in-house, full-time, PhD editors. Please find enclosed a manuscript entitled: “Bedform genesis in bedrock substrates: insights into formative processes from a new experimental approach and the importance of suspension-dominated abrasion” which I am submitting for exclusive consideration for publication in Geomorphology. Submission of a manuscript to International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation for publication implies that the same work has not been either published or under consideration for publication in another Journal. Only material that has not been published previously (either in print or electronically) and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, with the exception of an abstract that is less than 400 words in length, will be considered for publication. (Please provide relevant details in the Comments box below, along with the originally published text. Manuscript templates 1. In case the manuscript is acceptable for peer review, the Subject Editor has to invite reviewers by clicking on the Invite reviewers link. statement confirming the manuscript has not been previously published by any of the authors and/or is not under consideration for publication in another journal at the time of submission. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations disclosed in a submitted manuscript would not used by an editor in own research except with the consent of the author. Additionally, the editors will make every effort to ensure the integrity of the review process by not revealing the identity of the reviewers of a manuscript to the authors of that manuscript. OMICS Group will support authors by posting the published version of articles by NIH grant-holders to PubMed Central immediately after publication. The guidelines below offer suggestions to authors and describe paper selection, review, revision, and publication processes. Because of the above, surveillance, early detection, control and eradication of these. Four types of manuscripts are published in Biotechnology Progress: Research articles, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and Notes. Appeals are considered at the discretion of the Editors, and in general, appeals that are not scientific in nature will not be considered. Guidance and criteria for authorship can be found in our editorial. 0 International License). Thank you for submitting your article "Ten common inferential mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript" to eLife for consideration as a Features Article. You can access your manuscript via the 'Live Manuscript' folder at any time during the editorial process. manuscript ideas are encouraged to call the Editorial Office at 888. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. Authors' contributions. Once the Editor is satisfied with the final manuscript, the manuscript can be accepted. € Articles. Submissions that are incomplete or that do not comply with the guidelines below will be returned to the author for completion before they will be entered into the editorial process. If an article is accepted for publication, the author is responsible for providing the journal staff with a clean, corrected copy of the manuscript in Word format. Manuscript accepted in MS (. • Limited or no subheadings within the body of the manuscript. Stage 2: Full manuscript submission and review. What is In Review?. Submission to Journal of Cell Science implies that this is the case and that the submitted manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Submissions to AJET should be unpublished and not under consideration by another journal or for a conference proceedings. Below is a point-by-point response to the reviewers comments. Only one appeal is permitted for each manuscript, and the paper must not be under consideration elsewhere. Although we accept simultaneous submissions, we would like you to let us know if you have sent your manuscripts to other publishers. Anyone involved in peer reviewer must first accept the invitation to review your manuscript. After manuscript submission, all authors of papers under consideration for publication will be sent a link to the Authorship Form to complete and submit. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. Reed, MD- None. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. 标 题: Nature 子刊 manuscript under consideration 三星期了 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 22 22:11:04 2019, 美东) 本人理工科穷冷老专业,平时都只在自己领域的杂志灌水。一般投稿后三到五天就收到 editorial office的决定,要不送审,要不直接被拒。. particularly, they said i have to cut down the number of words of my manuscript to 5000 and the resubmit. 1 Manuscripts submitted to the Journal must not be under consideration elsewhere (§8) and will be considered copyrighted to Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Receipt of manuscripts. In your cover letter, suggest 3–5 potential reviewers for your manuscript. How to submit your manuscript 5. All manuscripts under review or published with the Emerging Science Journal are subject to screening using "iThenticate" software. Once your manuscript has been finalised, click on the 'Approve Submission' button to submit your manuscript for consideration. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. The revised manuscript has to be submitted within two weeks. Citing articles in Research Integrity and Peer Review. The manuscript continues to be 25 pages long (including title, abstract, references, and tables). Editors who make final decisions about manuscripts should recuse themselves from editorial decisions if they have relationships or activities that pose potential conflicts related to articles under consideration. Questions concerning editorial policies or decisions should be addressed to the Editors at [email protected] • Limited or no subheadings within the body of the manuscript. Extreme Microbiology publishes research on microbial life that flourishes or persists under permanent or periodic extreme environmental conditions. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. After consideration by at least two prestigious journals, Nature and JAMA, his research remains unpublished. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Suggested Reviewers: Submit names and email addresses of at least four scientists from different countries who could evaluate the work. , the author is invited to revise the manuscript as per editorial reviews and resubmit to the journal for further consideration regarding publication). Editors make decisions on the acceptance of the manuscript solely on its intellectual merit (originality, novelty, and significant contribution to the field). Given that the manuscripts discussed at meetings are those still under consideration after two elimination rounds, and that referees are not necessarily experts and can sometimes be wrong, the continuing influence of peer reviewers is especially important. See our editorial policies for author guidance on good citation practice. Authors' contributions. More granular details on manuscript formatting, including guidance on information to include in each section of the file, are included in the Manuscript Formatting Guidelines below. The appeal should provide a point-by-point scientific rebuttal of the rejection decision. Publishers' policies on self-archiving (including of preprint versions) can also be found at SHERPA/RoMEO. Although we accept simultaneous submissions, we would like you to let us know if you have sent your manuscripts to other publishers. Deposition of research manuscripts prior to submission on community pre-print servers, or of conference presentations online, will not be considered prior publication and will not compromise. Authors are. Under Creative Commons, authors retain copyright in their articles. New Manuscript jobs added daily. , once accepted. They should call to the responsible editor's attention any major resemblances between a manuscript under consideration and other published articles or papers of which they are aware, as well as any concerns they might have in relation to the ethical acceptability of the research reported in the manuscript. But in view of Nature's extreme space constraints and the large number of active papers under consideration at any one time, editors cannot assign a high priority to consideration of such appeals. up for consideration of publication in IJPPS. All articles submitted should be original work and must not be under consideration by other publications. Manuscript Style. Second, all four archetypes are subjective. 0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im. The submission described here has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), nor is it currently under consideration for publication in another journal, nor will it be submitted elsewhere prior to this journal's making an editorial decision. IntroductionThere are a number of criteria by which an animal disease is classified as notifiable; the most important are typically related with its potential to spread internationally, as well as its impact on the health of domestic livestock, wildlife and, not the least, on human health. Powered by Research Square and developed in partnership with Springer Nature In Review also gives authors and readers access to the status of a manuscript via a peer review timeline while the paper is under review at the journal. Authors are invited and encouraged to submit their original and unpublished manuscripts to this journal. For this reason, the editors select only the most scientifically promising manuscripts for in-depth peer review. where or be under simultaneous consideration by another journal. The usual length of an AJET article is between 5000 and 8000 words, including abstract, figures, tables and references, but occasionally lengths outside this range are accepted. AJDM encourages the online submission of materials to be considered for publication. Following completion of the study, authors will complete the manuscript, including Results and discussion sections. Examples of different manuscript submission systems include ScholarOne (SAGE and some Nature Publishing Group journals), Editorial Manager (Springer, Wiley, PLOS, and more), and EVISE ® (Elsevier). the manuscript accordingly. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria; That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. This is how we handle it for Limnology and Oceanography. After consideration by at least two prestigious journals, Nature and JAMA, his research remains unpublished. The favored approach includes counseling on appropriate weight gain, exercise, and diet and/or pharmacologic treatment to achieve optimal control. Depending on the nature of the work, we will either send it out for anonymous review or will review it at one of our tri-annual editorial collective meetings. Special Articles are manuscripts whose content and style do not fall under the categories of Original Reports or Review Articles. Presubmission Enquiries 2. Our open access policy is in in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, pass them as data to. All manuscripts that remain under consideration at Psychology of Violence will be asked to include the following: The abstract is the most important paragraph in any paper. Notfollowing the formatspecified for a particular journal may be taken as carelessness on the part of the author,. All articles submitted should be original work and must not be under consideration by other publications. During manuscript submission, the submitting author must provide contact information (full name, email address, institutional affiliation and mailing address) for all of the co-authors. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work. The competition for journal space requires a great deal of time and effort on the part of editorial readers whose main compensation for this service is the opportunity to read papers prior to publication and the gratification associated with discharge of a professional obligation. Regardless of the source of word-processing tool used, Word (. Editorial and Journal Policies. We welcome reviewers to contact DMM editorial staff at any point for further information or assistance. cut marks on bones" to Nature Communications. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor in chief, the editorial board, the peer-reviewers­­­­­ and the publisher. This allows the system to have a fine-grained security approach. In Review is a free preprint service that gives authors the option to have their paper posted online at the time of submission to select journals. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor's final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer). 1 weeks: 14. See our editorial policies for author guidance on good citation practice. (1) The bibliography is primarily focused on simulation tests and critical analysis of them. Manuscript Status Blan If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at Nature Communications, a copy of the related In other words, related manuscript files means any other manuscript that overlaps with the one submitted to Nature and hence runs the risk of. Authorship 4. Questions regarding manuscript handling and status should be addressed to [email protected] Examples of different manuscript submission systems include ScholarOne (SAGE and some Nature Publishing Group journals), Editorial Manager (Springer, Wiley, PLOS, and more), and EVISE ® (Elsevier). 1 weeks: n/a: 2: 3 (good) 3 (good) Rejected. The editorial office first check that all files arrived intact, then print the paper, to check for any major errors that would prevent the paper from being refereed. The link to the preprint remains while the paper is actively under consideration by the journal, including while the author is adding any revision. manuscript, our manuscript is not about measuring limiting temperature or studying equilibrium configurations of nuclear systems. In submitting a manuscript for publication, an author should inform the editor of related manuscripts that the author has under editorial consideration or in press. In cats, one can see Transient Diabetes Mellitus, in which Diabetes is a serious disease in which blood glucose or blood sugar levels are above the normal range. If quantitative methods use is necessary the authors are expected to prove in the manuscript that quantification of the phenomena under study is warranted. Adoption was introduced relatively late into English law under the 1926 Adoption Act. This means your paper is undergoing preliminary. 5 Authors will disclose if any other manuscripts related to their submission are under consideration by other journals during the editorial process. Manuscript Preparation. Author conduct regarding plagiarism, dual submission, previous related work, and discussion of manuscript with reviewers; Citing the submitted paper in other relevant work under consideration for publication. If clarification is needed, send an email message to the journal with the following subject line: Status, Manuscript ID, Corresponding Author Name. Under Creative Commons, authors retain copyright in their articles. What is In Review?. Editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers and Lilith Editorial Board. Similarity reports will be reviewed individually. Second, all four archetypes are subjective. For this reason, the editors select only the most scientifically promising manuscripts for in-depth peer review. 2 Declaration of conflicting interests 6. All manuscripts must be accompanied by an abstract of up to 150 words stating precisely the analytical problem under consideration, the method of argument addressed to the problem and the conclusions reached by the author(s). All text must be double-spaced in 150 Times New Roman font. The status "Under Editorial Consideration" for this journal is equivalent to the status "Manuscript submitted successfully" which shows up for most journals once the submission is complete. Sites where to Get Information what to Do if Nature Manuscript Under Consideration has gotten 455 views and has gathered 1 votes from 1 voters. We stress that this manuscript contains original work, which has not been published elsewhere, and, moreover, we maintain that it is not under consideration for publication in any other journal, proceedings, etc. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the corresponding journal. In Reference List: Journal article; DOIs are formatted the same as URLs. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by a proper citation. , a pharmaceutical company or contract research organization). We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The Florida Historical Quarterly is a peer-refereed journal and accepts for consideration manuscripts on the history of Florida, its people, and its historical relationships to the United States, the Atlantic World, the Caribbean, or Latin America. TIP: All cover letters should contain these sentences: We confirm that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Please do not send more than one manuscript at a time. SUBMISSION Submissiona of an article implies that the results described have not been published previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere, without the written consent of the publisher. particularly, they said i have to cut down the number of words of my manuscript to 5000 and the resubmit. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. The text of the twins paper is replete with expansive claims of a medical breakthrough. The editors and editorial board will consider new topics, and authors should not be restricted by those listed below. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Manuscript Guidelines Guidelines for Submissions to the Florida Historical Quarterly. In cats, one can see Transient Diabetes Mellitus, in which Diabetes is a serious disease in which blood glucose or blood sugar levels are above the normal range. Correspondence. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria; That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. Reviewer conflict of interest Conflict of interest (COI) self-assessment must be performed by members of the editorial team and external peer reviewers involved in the assessment of manuscripts. not used for personal advantage. Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to PAMJ must not be under consideration by any other journal. Please note: even as we have made an efficient editorial timeline a high priority, we are seeing the time that manuscripts spend under consideration rise as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was chaired by Matthew Driscoll and comprised David Birnbaum and Merrillee Proffitt, in addition to the TEI Editors. SARE: Southeast Asian Review of English is a peer-reviewed international journal founded in 1980 that publishes scholarly articles and other materials. Editorial comment: The natural history of a manuscript Authors who submit manuscripts to dif- ferent journals find that the procedures fol- lowed by the journals may differ, and often find the whole process somewhat mysteri- ous. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Format of the File. This means your paper is undergoing preliminary. You can check the Editorial Board for the chief Editor, and sometimes find the name of the Editor responsible for the specific section into which your work falls. Author conduct regarding plagiarism, dual submission, previous related work, and discussion of manuscript with reviewers; Citing the submitted paper in other relevant work under consideration for publication. ONLINE MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION. not used for personal advantage. Web links and URLs: All web links and URLs, including links to the authors' own websites, should be given a reference number and included in the reference list rather than within the text of the manuscript. All authors must be aware of, and have consented to, the submission. Questions concerning editorial policies or decisions should be addressed to the Editors at [email protected] This allows the system to have a fine-grained security approach. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. 1 SAGE Choice and Open Access 6. € Articles. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Nature Methods has no external editorial board; all decisions are made by the team of in-house, full-time, PhD editors. Updated May 2020 Submission Guidelines. Manuscripts that are commercial in nature will not be considered. Launched initially by the Malaysian Association for Commonwealth Literature and Language Studies (MACLALS), it is now produced by the Department of English at the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of Universiti Malaya, the. Manuscripts must not be submitted elsewhere while under consideration with ER. [RETURN TO TOP] Peer Review. Article types 3. Editorial comment: The natural history of a manuscript Authors who submit manuscripts to dif- ferent journals find that the procedures fol- lowed by the journals may differ, and often find the whole process somewhat mysteri- ous. That said, the citation issue and possible overlap was not a main reason for our decision. Authors are. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. It is the obligation of the editor to ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider the manuscript. TABLE TYPES OF MANUSCRIPT AND WORD LIMITS CHECKLIST. com International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research (IJEBMR: ISSN 2456-7760) is a double blind peer reviewed monthly journal , with a strong Editorial Board and a tested rapid review system. Once returned, the reviewer comments are sent to the Associate Editor (who may provide additional comments), and then finally to the Subject Editor. Reviews completed for the journal are owned by the journal and are not published. After consideration by at least two prestigious journals, Nature and JAMA, his research remains unpublished. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria; That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. The SOIL editorial board reserves the right to remove or to censor referee reports and any other comments if they contain personal insults or if they are not of substantial nature or of direct relevance to the issues raised in the manuscript under review. AIMS & SCOPE. The 40-page limit refers to manuscripts being double-spaced, in 12 point type, Times New Roman font and includes notes and figures. Submissions must include a cover letter stating that the manuscript has not been previously published (except in abstract form), is not presently under consideration by another journal, and will not be submitted to another journal before a final editorial decision from JPAH is rendered. The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. As communities, educators, and students around the world experience the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and racial violence, the Editorial Board encourages the submission of. Reviews completed for the journal are owned by the journal and are not published. Manuscripts that are commercial in nature will not be considered. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information regarding the status of a manuscript under consideration by the Physical Review journals is available on the following webpage. The editorial board gives preference to works in which the following issues are analysed: economic mechanisms, in particular monetary processes, financial markets, and the functioning of financial institutions and their impact on economic processes. Authors' contributions. Submission of the manuscript will be held to imply that it has not been previously published and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and further that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere. Our aim is to make a decision on each manuscript within 3 months. An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Information about relevant financial relationships outside the submitted work. **Exceptions: Any material—even if it’s only one line—of a creative nature (for example, a poem, song or famous quote), or of a potentially sensitive nature (controversial, potentially defamatory or libelous, etc. All authors must be aware of, and have consented to, the submission. These methods include shared keywords between papers and reviewers, Deputy Editor and author recommendations, scanning the reference list, and using outside sources (e. " Nature Communications: 5. Reviewers are also provided with information on how to peer review for the journal. Submission of a manuscript requires that all authors agree to the authorship as listed in the manuscript. Disclosure and conflict of interest: unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without. If accepted for the final manuscript, I will receive at least four weeks to revise the essay in response in editorial feedback. The manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere All authors meet the definition of authorship as set out by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Footnote 22 Permission has been obtained from the copyright holder(s) if indicated, for the use of any third-party textual, graphic, artistic or other material. : an access date, not generally required by Chicago, may be required by your publisher or discipline; if so, include it parenthetically at the end of the citation, as in the fourth example below). Cell/Nature. Frank Sciurba, MD- No relevant disclosures in 36 months prior to the submission of this manuscript. If you have not done so already, please alert us to any related manuscripts from your group that are under consideration or in press at other journals, or are being written up for submission to other journals (see. Web links and URLs: All web links and URLs, including links to the authors' own websites, should be given a reference number and included in the reference list rather than within the text of the manuscript. NIH policy allows the submission of certain elements of a competing application to be deferred until later in the application process, after review when the application is under consideration for funding. 0 Internation licence (CC-BY). Correct manuscript format. The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other paper of which they have personal knowledge. Similarity reports will be reviewed individually. In other hands, all authors who are listed in a manuscript have contributed to the research and the manuscript submitted to the journal. , publishers, and GEN Publishing, Inc. again about 10-12 advisors…. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Stage 1 submissions should include the manuscript (details below) and a brief cover letter. Editorial criteria and processes This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled. Once returned, the reviewer comments are sent to the Associate Editor (who may provide additional comments), and then finally to the Subject Editor. Submissions that are incomplete or that do not comply with the guidelines below will be returned to the author for completion before they will be entered into the editorial process. The work under consideration for publication. The CP editorial board reserves the right to remove or to censor referee reports and any other comments if they contain personal insults or if they are not of substantial nature or of direct relevance to the issues raised in the manuscript under review. The submission must be original, be based upon a high level of evidence, have immediate relevance to patient care, and not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. CONCLUSION. The manuscript must be sent in a Microsoft Office Word file, with mandatory configuration of A4 paper size (210 × 297 mm) and 2 cm margins on all sides, font Times New Roman size 12 and 1. Correspondence. After manuscript submission, all authors of papers under consideration for publication will be sent a link to the Authorship Form to complete and submit. The favored approach includes counseling on appropriate weight gain, exercise, and diet and/or pharmacologic treatment to achieve optimal control. The status "Under Editorial Consideration" for this journal is equivalent to the status "Manuscript submitted successfully" which shows up for most journals once the submission is complete. The appeal should provide a point-by-point scientific rebuttal of the rejection decision. Information about relevant financial relationships outside the submitted work. For example, an author on one manuscript may be a reviewer on another manuscript. 2562 or to email the AJOB Editorial Office at [email protected] Editors who make final decisions about manuscripts should recuse themselves from editorial decisions if they have relationships or activities that pose potential conflicts related to articles under consideration. The Journal publishes papers based on original research that are judged after editorial review to make a substantial contribution to the understanding of any area. All the authors listed in the manuscript are assumed to have agreed to the following policy of Ann Dermatol on submission of manuscripts. Submissions must include a cover letter stating that the manuscript has not been previously published (except in abstract form), is not presently under consideration by another journal, and will not be submitted to another journal before a final editorial decision from JPAH is rendered. manuscript ideas are encouraged to call the Editorial Office at 888. In rare instances we may determine after careful consideration that we should not make certain portions of the prepublication record publicly available. Before being sent to reviewers, manuscripts are pre-screened by the editorial office to check that they agree with the criteria for publishing in International Journal of One Health: accordance with the aims and scope of the journal, nature of the study, originality of the results, quantity and quality of data, general conclusions, and presentation of the work with a good quality of English language. The editors will not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than the author(s), reviewers and potential reviewers. Submitting the Manuscript to the Journal: Manuscripts to the International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research should be submitted online through the login/submission. Submission of a manuscript to International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation for publication implies that the same work has not been either published or under consideration for publication in another Journal. A cover letter should accompany each manuscript. The cover letter must address all points raised in the manuscript’s editorial reviews. Guidance and criteria for authorship can be found in our editorial. substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other. Authors can also enter the names of potential peer reviewers they wish to exclude from consideration in the peer review of their manuscript, during the initial submission progress. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. Any manuscript, which does not adhere with these below standards, will be reverted back/rejected immediately in Editorial screening. Nature Communications offers authors of papers that have been sent out for review the option to have the corresponding preprint included in a public list. Please provide your manuscript an informative 100-250 word abstract. The added/revised text and explanations are given below. Due regard must be paid to ethical considerations, and the submission must conform to the journal's policy on plagiarism and publication ethics (see Publication Ethics in following section). The submitted synopsis of your proposed book would be tabled for recommendation, and approval of our editorial board. The appeal should provide a point-by-point scientific rebuttal of the rejection decision. Manuscript Status Blan If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at Nature Communications, a copy of the related In other words, related manuscript files means any other manuscript that overlaps with the one submitted to Nature and hence runs the risk of. “Submissions with a Decision”或“Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration”此状态表面你的文章不幸被拒。. A manuscript under editorial consideration indicates that the work has not been rejected out of hand, but is being given a second look. Correct manuscript format. Authors are also advised to go through the current set of Instructions to Authors and prepare their manuscripts. The article was accepted after three rounds of revisions, and the status changes are attached for others' reference. Submission of the manuscript will be held to imply that it has not been previously published and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and further that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere. Nature: n/a: n/a: 12. Please refer to this ID in all correspondence with the Editorial Office. Unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations disclosed in a submitted manuscript would not used by an editor in own research except with the consent of the author. cut marks on bones" to Nature Communications. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. What is In Review?. Authors are. A list of reviewers will appear from which the. A reviewer should also call to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published material of which they have personal knowledge. We stress that this manuscript contains original work, which has not been published elsewhere, and, moreover, we maintain that it is not under consideration for publication in any other journal, proceedings, etc. A manuscript writer may receive a letter from a publisher or the editor of a journal saying a submitted manuscript is under editorial consideration. 1 weeks: 14. Correspondence submissions must be no longer than 750 words, no more than 10 references, and no more than a total of 2 figures and tables (combined). A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Publishing ethics issues The Institute of Chemistry of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova as publisher must ensure that good practice is maintained to the standards outlined above. The editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Such circumstances will be a consideration in the editorial review process and may be a cause for rejection. The manuscript should be in Microsoft Word Format (DOC or DOCX) or in Rich Text Format (RTF). To increase transparency, reviewers may choose to sign their reports. Manuscript Title: Yes, specify nature of compensation Section 3. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. To keep abreast of current trends and challenges, we travel to multiple. REVISIONS: If we feel your submission needs further work, we will either 1) Return the manuscript to you with suggestions for changes, or 2) Make minor editorial changes and submit the revised manuscript for your approval. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. 1 SAGE Choice and Open Access 6. A 'Manuscript Approved' message will display on your author desktop to confirm the submission. com Decision on Nature manuscript 2014-02-01640A April 29, 2014 11:57 PM. submitting to you for consideration of publication in Int. If you think you are unable to meet the deadline, please notify the Editorial Office. AWS publishes research exploring theoretical, experimental, and practical approaches that advance fundamental understanding and application of all aspects of water works and any source water that could conceivably become a. Then, once all reviewers are in place, the manuscript is peer reviewed, which results in peer review reports that are returned to the editorial office for consideration by the Editor-in-Chief. method was followed until 1901 under the general direction of Doctor Marcus Jastrow, Editor-in-Chief, with Doctor Kaufman Kohler and Doctor Frederick de Sola Mendes as the other members of the Editorial Committee. This allows the system to have a fine-grained security approach. 0 International License). "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)). Submissions must include a cover letter stating that the manuscript has not been previously published (except in abstract form), is not presently under consideration by another journal, and will not be submitted to another journal before a final editorial decision from JPAH is rendered. For 21 days the manuscript status was "under consideration". If anything, that notification is a signal to get ready for the next step. Congratulations Nila for making top 10 shortlist of Nature India Photo Contest! The Nature India editorial and design teams have chosen ten stunning finalists, that will be rolled out (in no particular order of merit) over the next few days. The manuscript will be then rejected/returned through the online editorial system and the respective notification email will be sent from the Editorial Office. Bauer Media. Depending on the nature and content of the manuscript, either the Editor-in-Chief will send the manuscript to an appropriate member of the Advisory Board or Editorial Board who will then send the manuscript to at least two competent reviewers, or the Editor-in-Chief will ask two appropriate members of the Advisory Board and/or Editorial Board. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and. The manuscript should be in Microsoft Word Format (DOC or DOCX) or in Rich Text Format (RTF). Manuscript accepted in MS (. For example, an author on one manuscript may be a reviewer on another manuscript. Only one appeal is permitted for each manuscript, and the paper must not be under consideration elsewhere. Dagenais also addresses the theory and practice of reading in the Middle Ages, showing that for medieval readers the text on the manuscript leaf, including the text of the Libro, was primarily rhetorical and ethical in nature. Under the provisions of 44 U. If the experts' opinions disagree on the relevance of publishing the paper under evaluation, wherein one of them favors approval while other favors rejection, the editorial committee shall make the final decision. This monthly publication is aimed at a broad, interdisciplinary audience of academic and industry researchers actively involved in laboratory practice. The manuscript should be in Microsoft Word Format (DOC or DOCX) or in Rich Text Format (RTF). Select from the following submission options based on the length of 151 your manuscript: 152 1. The editorial team will respect these requests so long as this does not interfere with the objective and thorough assessment of the submission. Cell/Nature. Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional. Please provide your manuscript an informative 100-250 word abstract. Appraising proposals and manuscripts for publication requires considerable resources. substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other. Authors should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. the manuscript accordingly. Disclosure and conflict of interest: unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and. Media House. The editor and the editorial staff should not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than reviewers and potential reviewers. AWWA Water Science is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original, refereed (peer-reviewed) research on the science, engineering, and social aspects of water. 最近一篇文章的投稿,今天发现状态变了,从Manuscript under consideration 变为Manuscript under editorial consideration。有没有高人知道这两个状态的差别是什么? 是不是不经外审,编辑直接拒稿的意思?谢谢。 Stage Start Date Manuscript under editorial consideration 13th Oct 10. Second, all four archetypes are subjective. Submissions must include a cover letter stating that the manuscript has not been previously published (except in abstract form), is not presently under consideration by another journal, and will not be submitted to another journal before a final editorial decision from JPAH is rendered. I/we, the authors, hereby state that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication by any other journal or elsewhere (except in the form of a poster abstract (in conferences/seminars) or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis). 3 Funding acknowledgement. Notfollowing the formatspecified for a particular journal may be taken as carelessness on the part of the author,. In case the manuscript is acceptable for peer review, the Subject Editor has to invite reviewers by clicking on the Invite reviewers link. Article types 3. In times of great affluence, the Editorial Board holds the right to limit the number of submissions one can send at once for review and, ultimately, for publication. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review. Please send work to our editorial and business office, along with a cover letter explaining your project. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Manuscripts submitted to PSQ should be original research and should not be under consideration by any other journal at the same time. If the editors decide that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in Review of Scientific Instruments, you may transfer your manuscript, without resubmitting, to AIP Advances for immediate consideration. If you have not done so already, please alert us to any related manuscripts from your group that are under consideration or in press at other journals, or are being written up for submission to other journals (see. The first round of review: Manuscript under consideration, 5th June 2019; Manuscript under consideration, 6th May 2019; Editor Assigned, 5th May 2019; Manuscript submitted, 5th May 2019. We ask reviewers and authors not to directly contact each other while the manuscript is under consideration, rather keep all communication through ScholarOne with the Editor’s involvement. edu Reply-To: m. The added/revised text and explanations are given below. Or it means that the editor has made up his mind and they gonna discuss it now with other members of the editorial board. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria; That the article is original, has not already been published in a journal, and is not currently under consideration by another journal.